| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 |
101. Brain-in-a-box status - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Sol Project wrote: CCP Habakuk wrote: ... a given solar system ... No. I don't know why it's wrong in-game, but maybe someone simply didn't know better and through the fact that the public gets this wrong easily, nobody cared about even no...
- by Kagura Nikon - at 2014.11.01 08:13:19
|
102. Getting into PVP. How do I practice or ease into it? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Get into a corp with that focus. Use cheap ships, like frigates and t1 cruisers. Go to low sec, be FW or not. Lose a few ships. Yes lose ships. The most importatn thing to learn in pvp is to control the adrenaline and fear when things get hot. Yo...
- by Kagura Nikon - at 2014.10.26 10:21:11
|
103. Tech 3 Destroyers coming in RHEA - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Xuixien wrote: Jessica Duranin wrote: Xuixien wrote: Tech3's are not fine as they are, and are in fact terribly balanced. When you fit them for combat roles, they outperform the tech2 combat variants. Of course they do. They cost more, ...
- by Kagura Nikon - at 2014.10.26 10:18:13
|
104. Tech 3 Destroyers coming in RHEA - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Xuixien wrote: Kagura Nikon wrote: Xuixien wrote: Garbage, absolute garbage. They should balance the existing tech3's before introducing more wonky crap. Nope. You are shortsighted. No, the shortsighted ones are the kids going "O...
- by Kagura Nikon - at 2014.10.26 10:11:35
|
105. Tech 3 Destroyers coming in RHEA - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Freako X wrote: I'm not gonna lie .... I was hoping for one of the T3 modes to be for small ship fleet boosts. Of course, that would include on-grid buffing only .... But that would be too much I guess. They already cannot makepeopel use...
- by Kagura Nikon - at 2014.10.25 08:17:59
|
106. Tech 3 Destroyers coming in RHEA - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Xuixien wrote: Garbage, absolute garbage. They should balance the existing tech3's before introducing more wonky crap. Nope. You are shortsighted. THey need to add these new t3 to create more demand for wormhole stuff. OR wormhole communi...
- by Kagura Nikon - at 2014.10.25 08:17:01
|
107. Corp Kick Queue - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
In before the first day we get an auto kcic k bug and every single player is kicked from its corp.
- by Kagura Nikon - at 2014.10.25 08:15:43
|
108. The Null Deal: A Statement from Sovereign Nullsec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Emma Muutaras wrote: as for destructible stations no just no i can see already that it will lead to massive amounts of players losing everything on the first day its in place and just quitting. it will be a case of needing enough supercaps to...
- by Kagura Nikon - at 2014.09.30 10:06:00
|
109. The Null Deal: A Statement from Sovereign Nullsec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I do not like the concepts of using missions. I still think other kind of anomalies or better belt rattign stuff woudl be the way to go economically. Something simple would be the more time pirate NPCs are alive in a system the more the alliance...
- by Kagura Nikon - at 2014.09.30 10:04:00
|
110. Module Tiericide. Aren't we losing something here? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ocih wrote: The lore needs to be modified to support the lore. An Amarr fleet is gimped when fighting Caldari fleets because they are seen as alliance members. A Gallente fleet is gimped against Minmatar (Gallente Exp resist) because they are ...
- by Kagura Nikon - at 2014.09.29 15:30:00
|
111. Petition to remove pvp ship combat from high sec. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Unezka Turigahl wrote: [Iteron Mark V, New Setup 1] Damage Control II Power Diagnostic System II Power Diagnostic System II Power Diagnostic System II Power Diagnostic System II Adaptive Invulnerability Field II Adaptive Invulnerability Field ...
- by Kagura Nikon - at 2014.09.23 09:48:00
|
112. Dodging Wardecs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Veers Belvar wrote: Kagura Nikon wrote: Oxide Ammar wrote: CCP won't be touching wardec mechanics and npc corporation fiasco, wardec was suppose to be for game reasons but apparently griefing wasn't one of them and since like most of ward...
- by Kagura Nikon - at 2014.09.22 14:29:00
|
113. Dodging Wardecs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Oxide Ammar wrote: CCP won't be touching wardec mechanics and npc corporation fiasco, wardec was suppose to be for game reasons but apparently griefing wasn't one of them and since like most of wardecs in hisec are orbiting around griefing only...
- by Kagura Nikon - at 2014.09.22 11:55:00
|
114. Dodging Wardecs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Josef Djugashvilis wrote: Lordy, Kagura, perhaps you should have looked up the meaning of the word, 'xenophobia' before you used it. Folk with social skills do not play Eve Online, I thought everyone knew that? I am one of the 'many' ergo wha...
- by Kagura Nikon - at 2014.09.22 11:53:00
|
115. Dodging Wardecs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Black Panpher wrote: I have 2 soutions! Grow a pair and pvp out of high sec or grow a pair and dec some entity that is more than 1 person lol. I can't believe this has generated so many pages, risk averse high sec children complaining about ri...
- by Kagura Nikon - at 2014.09.22 11:49:00
|
116. Dodging Wardecs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Josef Djugashvilis wrote: Kagura Nikon wrote: Gevlon Goblin wrote: The main issue is not addressed: people drop a corp because that particular corp is worthless. He might value the 0% tax, so creates a new one, but that particular corp ha...
- by Kagura Nikon - at 2014.09.22 10:48:00
|
117. Dodging Wardecs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Gevlon Goblin wrote: The main issue is not addressed: people drop a corp because that particular corp is worthless. He might value the 0% tax, so creates a new one, but that particular corp has no value to him, so he isn't motivated to try to d...
- by Kagura Nikon - at 2014.09.22 09:50:00
|
118. Dodging Wardecs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Xuixien wrote: while we're at it lets remove gatguns... theyre oboslete at this point anyway due to logi and such Besides this, which is a big yes, why don't rats gatecamp in highsec? Now that would be a content c...
- by Kagura Nikon - at 2014.09.19 11:31:00
|
119. Dodging Wardecs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Prince Kobol wrote: Also why do I need a reason to war somebody? Because forcing you to have a reason is the first step in handcuffing player freedom, of course. We always have a reason. a) we were paid. b)...
- by Kagura Nikon - at 2014.09.18 14:40:00
|
120. Dodging Wardecs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Matcha Mosburger wrote: Not trying to be an ass or troll... But seriously why WD a 1 or even 2 or 3 man corp in the first place? Also if they are loosing you so much money from WDing them and they they just close Corp... why do you keep WDing 1...
- by Kagura Nikon - at 2014.09.18 14:39:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |